?

Log in

No account? Create an account
inshallah - The Criminal Heart [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
mojrim

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

inshallah [Dec. 31st, 2007|03:03 pm]
mojrim
http://www.errantstory.com/archive.php?date=2006-08-07
linkReply

Comments:
From: butterflake
2008-01-02 06:08 pm (UTC)

not a deterrant

...even more reason to drag real science into arguments condemning shitty fantasy fiction.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: mojrim
2008-01-04 07:10 pm (UTC)

Re: not a deterrant

My point exactly. Uhh...no...

How can you say that? Think of the poor catgirls, and their bereavd owners!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: butterflake
2008-01-04 07:10 pm (UTC)

Re: not a deterrant

I'm supposed to respect someone who would own a catgirl?
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: mojrim
2008-01-11 02:31 am (UTC)

Re: not a deterrant

Who said anything about respect? Wait, no... You must respect life!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: butterflake
2008-01-11 03:32 am (UTC)

Re: not a deterrant

damn it - using my inner hippie against me.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: mojrim
2008-01-15 11:16 pm (UTC)

Re: not a deterrant

Hah, even the stupid life!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: butterflake
2008-01-15 11:22 pm (UTC)

Re: not a deterrant

Now, we must employ limits somewhere, if humanity is to survive at all. I'm calling it at catgirl owners.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: mojrim
2008-01-26 12:36 am (UTC)

Re: not a deterrant

So, catgirls and their owners must die to preserve humanity? I like that formulation.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: butterflake
2008-01-26 12:37 am (UTC)

Re: not a deterrant

It certainly would weed out a lot of the stupid.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: butterflake
2008-01-26 12:38 am (UTC)

Re: not a deterrant

...and having been 11 days, I apparently lost track of how the thread got to this point before responding. At least my opinions are consistent. }:{
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: mojrim
2008-02-16 12:52 am (UTC)

Re: not a deterrant

Oh yes, that they most certainly are....
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: butterflake
2008-02-16 12:53 am (UTC)

Re: not a deterrant

it's easy when they revolve around 'hate everything'
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: mojrim
2008-02-24 05:28 am (UTC)

Re: not a deterrant

It only makes us love you more...
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: butterflake
2008-02-25 12:08 am (UTC)

Re: not a deterrant

Nothing like shared hatred to bring people together :)
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: mojrim
2008-03-09 05:30 am (UTC)

Re: not a deterrant

Of course. Without a them, there's no us.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: butterflake
2008-03-10 06:28 pm (UTC)

Re: not a deterrant

Now that's a toss-up. Sacrifice my own happiness to rid the world of catgirls or keep them around as a group to rally against? Selfish either way, I suppose.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: mojrim
2008-03-12 12:36 am (UTC)

Re: not a deterrant

There is nothing more gratufying to the ego than self-immolation, I promise. Just slice your palm and sign here.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: butterflake
2008-03-12 05:08 pm (UTC)

Re: not a deterrant

wait a second... I die and you get to stay with all the catgirls? Suddenly, I don't like this plan.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: mojrim
2008-03-14 05:06 pm (UTC)

Re: not a deterrant

Not at all. The catgirls will be gone.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: butterflake
2008-03-14 05:21 pm (UTC)

Re: not a deterrant

...and now twice in one thread, it's proven that I can't read
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)